The 2-Minute Rule for religious based asylum case laws usa
The 2-Minute Rule for religious based asylum case laws usa
Blog Article
Google Scholar – a vast database of state and federal case legislation, which is searchable by keyword, phrase, or citations. Google Scholar also allows searchers to specify which level of court cases to search, from federal, to specific states.
Case regulation is specific to your jurisdiction in which it was rendered. By way of example, a ruling in a California appellate court would not normally be used in deciding a case in Oklahoma.
However, decisions rendered by the Supreme Court on the United States are binding on all federal courts, and on state courts regarding issues of the Constitution and federal law.
Acquittal nullifies prior guilt and fortifies petitioners' eligibility for appointment. No juridical impediment to appointment following acquittal. Equivalence of acquittals under compromise and criminal procedure code, as well as role of "badal-i-sulh" in restorative justice. Distinction between probationary release and acquittal. Probationary release as being a legally identified conviction. Read more
149 . Const. P. 6193/2016 (D.B.) Syed Musawar Shah V/S M.D CSD and Ors Sindh High Court, Karachi First and foremost, we would address the issue of maintainability of the instant Petition under Article 199 of your Constitution based within the doctrine of laches as this petition was filed in 2016, whereas the alleged cause of action accrued into the petitioner in 1992. The petitioner asserts that he pursued his legal remedy just after involvement inside the FIR lodged by FIA and during the intervening period the respondent dismissed him from service where after he preferred petition No.
Generally speaking, higher courts will not have direct oversight over the reduce courts of record, in that they cannot arrive at out on their initiative (sua sponte) at any time to overrule judgments from the decreased courts.
27 . Const. P. 4002/2011 (D.B.) Ibrahim Noor V/S Pakistan International Airways Corporation & Ors. Sindh High Court, Karachi Even, if a petitioner was acquitted in a very criminal case following a conviction, in NAB Reference No. twenty/2011, this does not automatically bring about exoneration from departmental charges based within the same factual grounds. Although a writ under Article 199 is obtainable in specific limited situations, it is generally not the right remedy to contest a dismissal from service based on these charges, particularly when the employee was afforded a full chance to cross-look at witnesses and present his/her defense but did not encourage the department of his/her innocence.
11 . Const. P. 1479/2024 (S.B.) Mst. Shir Bano and another V/S Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi Primarily, this is often a free and democratic place, and once a person becomes a major they can marry whosoever he/she likes; In case the parents on the boy or Female don't approve of these inter-caste or interreligious marriage the most they are able to do if they will Reduce off social relations with the son or maybe the daughter, Nonetheless they cannot give threats or commit or instigate for acts of violence and cannot harass the person who undergoes this kind of inter-caste or inter-religious marriage. I therefore, direct that the administration/police authorities will see, if any boy or Woman that's major undergoes inter-caste or inter-religious marriage with a woman or person that's a major, the pair is neither harassed by anyone nor subjected to threats or acts of violence and anyone who offers these types of threats or harasses or commits acts of violence possibly himself or at his instigation, is taken to endeavor by instituting criminal proceedings from the police against this sort of persons and further stern action is taken against this sort of person(s) as provided by law.
, which is Latin for click here “stand by decided matters.” This means that a court will be bound to rule in accordance with a previously made ruling within the same sort of case.
Binding Precedent – A rule or principle founded by a court, which other courts are obligated to observe.
The police have the power to arrest a person even without obtaining a warrant of arrest from a Court for cognizable offenses. The existence of this power casts an obligation over the police, and so they must bear in mind, as held by this Court from time to time in its several pronouncemnts, that if a person is arrested for a crime, his constitutional and fundamental rights must not be violated. Primarily, the Police Officers are required to protect rather than abduct. Read more
Summaries of cases that shape the lives of younger individuals, guaranteeing a deeper understanding of justice within the juvenile system. Knowledge that matters, crafted for legal professionals and enthusiasts alike.
We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site, or the information linked to on the state site. Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
States also ordinarily have courts that cope with only a specific subset of legal matters, for instance family regulation and probate. Case legislation, also known as precedent or common regulation, is definitely the body of prior judicial decisions that guide judges deciding issues before them. Depending over the relationship between the deciding court along with the precedent, case law might be binding or merely persuasive. For example, a decision by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit is binding on all federal district courts within the Fifth Circuit, but a court sitting in California (whether a federal or state court) isn't strictly bound to follow the Fifth Circuit’s prior decision. Similarly, a decision by a person district court in The big apple is just not binding on another district court, but the original court’s reasoning may help guide the second court in achieving its decision. Decisions via the U.S. Supreme Court are binding on all federal and state courts. Read more